Where do they get the time? Gin and Sitcoms in units of Wikipedia.

Gin carts kept society ticking over when the industrial revolution brought people in from the fields and gave them lots of free time in the company of others. It was a hole to dump the excess social time that society wasn't complex enough to consume. With time city life gained complexity to soak up this excess, and with it the Gin consumption fell. Clay Shirky argues that this process is repeating itself today with the hours after work, with the massive time sink that is the TV being carved into by creative time on the internet. That's a very poor summary of Shirkey's blog post - which is well worth your time - if only because he uses Wikipedias as a unit of free time.

"Okay, we're going to have a conversation about authority or social construction or whatever." That wasn't her question. She heard this story and she shook her head and said, "Where do people find the time?" That was her question. And I just kind of snapped. And I said, "No one who works in TV gets to ask that question. You know where the time comes from. It comes from the cognitive surplus you've been masking for 50 years."

So how big is that surplus? So if you take Wikipedia as a kind of unit, all of Wikipedia, the whole project--every page, every edit, every talk page, every line of code, in every language that Wikipedia exists in--that represents something like the cumulation of 100 million hours of human thought. I worked this out with Martin Wattenberg at IBM; it's a back-of-the-envelope calculation, but it's the right order of magnitude, about 100 million hours of thought.

And television watching? Two hundred billion hours, in the U.S. alone, every year. Put another way, now that we have a unit, that's 2,000 Wikipedia projects a year spent watching television. Or put still another way, in the U.S., we spend 100 million hours every weekend, just watching the ads. This is a pretty big surplus. People asking, "Where do they find the time?" when they're looking at things like Wikipedia don't understand how tiny that entire project is, as a carve-out of this asset that's finally being dragged into what Tim calls an architecture of participation.

This makes sense to me at the minute as I've been rather busy recently and I've been thinking about how I have too many things to do, and too many other things to consume.

Via BoingBoing


xumeiqing said...

yeezy boost 350
doudoune moncler
ugg boots
toms shoes
buy red bottoms
oakley sunglasses
polo ralph lauren outlet
gucci outlet
gucci outlet

chenmeinv0 said...

louis vuitton outlet stores
abercrombie and fitch new york
canada goose clothing
louis vuitton outlet stores
coach outlet store online
goose jackets outlet
montblanc pens
canada goose outlet
coach outlet store online
oakley sunglasses

LCc 03 said...

tiffany online
discount sunglasses
nike air zoom
oakley vault
vera bradley
fitflops clearance
cheap nfl jerseys
cheap air jordans

龙大猫 said...

patriots jersey
adidas ultra
tiffany and co uk
true religion jeans
ultra boost
nike zoom
ralph lauren online
adidas tubular runner
air jordan shoes
air jordan retro

chenmeinv0 said...

polo ralph lauren
oakley canada
nike trainers men
seahawks jerseys
hermes scarf
cheap oakley sunglasses
reebok outlet
rolex watches
coach outlet store online
reebok sneakers

Unknown said...

hermes belt
polo ralph lauren
ghd hair straighteners
gucci sito ufficiale
new york giants jerseys
chargers jerseys
oakley sunglasses
michael kors outlet
michael kors

chenmeinv0 said...

ray ban sunglasses
seattle seahawks jerseys
ray ban sunglasses
michael kors
michael kors handbags
golden state warriors jerseys
abercrombie & fitch
abercrombie outlet
nike running
oakley sunglasses

raybanoutlet001 said...

ugg outlet
saics running shoes
michael kors handbags
kate spade sale
nike air max 90
gucci shoes
michael kors handbags
sac longchamp
oakley sunglasses
jordan shoes