1 of a series of 1.
Comic #01 - Internet Drama
SkeptoTags:
comics,
misguided attempts at xkcd/WG style insight
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
Comments
About Skeptobot
- Bill
- writes Skeptobot. It serves as a medium to vent about Nonsense and geek out about Awesome. You'll find stuff about Badscience, Goodscience, Atheism, Humanism, Bad Religion all that New Renaissance Jazz. Awesome people email links, greetings, ideas and schemes to skeptobot@yahoo.co.uk You can also follow him on Twitter, Delicious & Youtube..
I've just prattled this:
BadscienceBlogs
- Ambriguous
- Away from the bench
- Azimov's Blog
- Bad Science
- Beyond the 2nd Law
- Consider, evaluate, act
- Dr Aust's Spleen
- Extraordinary Claims
- flammable flower
- Flexuosa
- Gimpy's Blog
- hawk/handsaw
- Holfordwatch - the truth about Patrick Holford
- JDC325's Weblog
- Pyjamas in bananas
- Shaplman's Blog
- Signs of Witness - keeping you up to date with the coming apocalypse
- The JREF 1 million dollar prize
- Transform Drugs
- Value Added Water
Tip Jar
4 comments:
This is both utterly wrong, and complete bullshit. I emphatically disagree with it in it's entirety.
Lewiep, it's clear you are from the school of "I can't express myself".
The article eloquently described loads of things accurately.
You are (yet again) wrong.
If you replaced "POV of article" with "an accurate description of the subject", and "those bothered to reply" with "those bothered to edit wikipedia", it'd be an apt way of describing why some Wikipedia articles are a bloodbath.
Every post here has made me very happy. Cheers!
Post a Comment